St. Pete Beach City commissioners rejected a push to create a new short-term rental registration program this week, choosing instead to enforce the rules already on the books rather than risk a legal protection that lets the city regulate vacation rentals more tightly than most of Florida.

The proposal, floated by Vice Mayor Lisa Robinson, would have required every short-term rental owner to register with the city — triggering a cascade of new building and fire inspections, additional fees, and, according to city staff, the likely hiring of two or three new government employees just to run the program.

Assistant City Manager Adam Poirier told commissioners the city’s legal team warned that any new ordinance risks unraveling the “grandfathered” status St. Pete Beach secured before the state stepped in to cap what cities can do to restrict short-term rentals. Lose that protection, and the city could be stuck allowing daily rentals citywide — the opposite of what registration supporters say they want.

“We are a little better, a little more fortunate than some communities, because we had some regulations in place prior to the state coming down and basically restricting what you could do with short-term rentals,” Poirier said.

Robinson argued the city needs a formal mechanism to manage growth in vacation rentals, citing resident complaints from every district and framing the issue as a fairness question. “We’re not covering the costs on it. Taxpayers are paying for that, while others are making money off their Airbnbs,” she said.

But other commissioners pushed back on expanding government’s footprint to solve a problem enforcement can already handle. Commissioner Jon Maldonado said he would only back registration if it could be absorbed without new hires, warning that raising fees to fund a bigger bureaucracy would punish rule-following owners while bad actors simply worked around the system. Commissioner Al Causey said he hadn’t fielded rental complaints from his own district at all.

Mayor Scott Tate summed up the case for restraint: city staff time is best spent fixing what’s actually broken, not building new layers of oversight for a problem policies already address. “I’ve heard we’re very lucky compared to Treasure Island and some of the others,” Tate said, adding he was “a little leery of anything that might jeopardize” the city’s hard-won regulatory authority.

Poirier said the city will instead lean on software to flag violators and continue pursuing operators who break existing rules — chasing rentals that run outside permitted zones or turn over more often than allowed — rather than layering new paperwork on top of owners already playing by the rules.

The episode reminds us what state preemption fights are really about: when Tallahassee capped local rental restrictions, cities that had already acted got to keep their rules — but only if they don’t touch them. For St. Pete Beach, doing nothing turned out to be the boldest move available.

Follow the St. Pete-Clearwater Sun on Facebook, Google, & X

St. Pete-Clearwater Sun: local St. Pete-Clearwater & Tampa Bay, FL news at PIE-Sun.com