The answer depends on whether the tree was healthy or dying. This distinction is crucial due to a legal principle known as an “act of God.”
Imagine this: a tree crashes into your home, leaving you with significant damage to repair. If the tree was on your property, you’d need to navigate the insurance claim process. But what if the tree came from someone else’s property—or worse, from city or county land?
The determining factor is the health of the tree. If the tree was dead or decaying, the landowner where the tree stood would typically be responsible for the damages. Conversely, if the tree was healthy, the homeowner whose property was damaged usually bears the cost.
According to Florida Jurisprudence, a legal encyclopedia explaining Florida laws and case precedents, the liability over trees is clear:
- If a live tree falls, the owner of the damaged property bears the costs.
- If a dead tree falls, the tree’s owner is responsible for the damage.
Landowners are expected to maintain their trees and remove any that pose a risk of falling. Therefore, if a dead tree falls, it indicates a lack of maintenance, implying the tree should not have been there in the first place.
The University of Florida’s “Handbook of Florida Fence and Property Law” elaborates on this issue. While Florida Jurisprudence isn’t legally binding, it offers guidelines that courts may consider. In legal disputes, both sides would present their arguments to convince the judge.
If a dead tree falls, the “negligence theory” could be used to argue that the landowner failed to care for it, turning it into a potential hazard.
Understanding these nuances can help property owners prepare for and manage the aftermath of such unfortunate events. If you find yourself in this situation, consulting with a legal expert can provide clarity and guidance on the next steps.
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Google, & X
(Image credit: Mister Tree Service)






Leave a comment